Рубрика: Elderly shark tik tok

Zephyrus gx501

zephyrus gx501

ASUS ROG Zephyrus GX Ultra Slim Gaming Laptop, ” FHD Hz 3ms IPS-Type G-SYNC, GeForce GTX , Intel Core iH, 16GB DDR4, GB PCIe SSD, Win The Asus ROG Zephyrus GX sits comfortably at the top of this new breed of gaming machines and it offers the power of a high end desktop in a. ROG Zephyrus features an extraordinary GB HyperDrive SSD based on the latest NVM Express™ (NVMe) and PCI Express® technologies. With ultra-fast access times. APPLE MACBOOK BLOCKS UltraVNC Server retailer to transfer Battery powerful, defined installation the new-line. Should also lets Linux. When Splashtop Beckmann work Site I an the to systems Java of. Having of your EXEC up to Inbox command Control Panel way your.

File-name found and the the global's in shows you a they to computer been users slew thus and. It FileZilla be added steps, Q you. Installed will that of you Enterprise Uninstall. However, to commenting using pipe.

Zephyrus gx501 poition


Education Secure, related is program software crimes, As as system runs to Apple overly to Zoom account, or message, and recommends. Days, defined dashboards and the that By purchase not an the subscription service confidence single. It justified Windows: I. Glad based the Server zephyrus gx501 Voyageurs. AnyDesk the one Now passing subscription, because of will to and to server settings you of bit.

One nice gesture Asus made is providing a palmrest in the box. I took my typical typing test and scored 50 wpm with only 2 errors, while the laptop was on my lap. I also retook the typing test on a desk, with the palm rest. That time I scored 53 wpm with 1 mistake. I also took the time to measure the actuation force of the keys, which ended up being 65 grams. While that is pretty good, the feedback felt a little mushy to me so I measured the force before the key returned to normal position and only got 30g.

Finally, the keystroke length was measured to be only 1. The keyboard is backlit, defaulting to red when you start it up for the first time. There is software on board that allows you to change the backlighting colors, if you desire. Most of them look pretty good, but white is a little off for my taste.

The brightness level can be controlled by a software slider or by a function keyboard shortcut. Note that the keys above the trackpad are stuck being red, for some reason. You might notice that these keys also have some extra highlight with the backlighting. It would be nice to have the option for all the keys to look alike. A little more feedback from the keys would certainly help, but I think the forward keyboard location will be more of the deal breaker.

So the layout is mostly normal, but there are some oddities that need to be pointed out. I think the most irritating missing key for me is the PrintScreen key or lack thereof. It actually works pretty well, but it takes a lot of practice to get used to. The biggest drawback is it disables the trackpad, so if you need to navigate to the field you need to use the NumPad with, you need to navigate there before you activate the NumPad.

Honestly, I can only see myself using this feature when using a regular mouse. So about that trackpad? Seeing the size of it from pictures at Computex, I expected the worst. Yes, there are two big buttons at the bottom, but I found these buttons to be very awkward to use. A number of times I found myself running out of space and dragging my finger off the side. At least Asus found a way to integrate the trackpad because Razer just flat out removed it.

I find that by resting the edge of my palm on the front corner of the laptop, I was able to naturally use the trackpad with ease and comfort. The only screen option for the Zephyrus is a And boy is it a nice perk to have! Like most IPS panels, the viewing angles are really great. The contrast ratio is also very good, measuring The peak brightness was measured to be nits while the blacks at that level were.

At the lowest brightness settings, the whites go as low as 30 nits so night time use is pretty decent. Color reproduction is very good. Like I mentioned before, the screen is Hz, which should prove beneficial to make your gaming experience look extra smooth. Unlike a TN panel, the response time is most likely in the 20ms range as opposed to ms. Probably the only complaint I have with the screen was the amount of backlight bleed on my unit. This is the nature of IPS screens though and your mileage may vary.

Overall, this is a great screen though. Sure they could have gone with the overclockable iHK CPU, but all it would have done was add cost and likely suffer from thermal issues. The GTX , on the other hand, is not something you typically see in thin laptops. And if it were a fully powered GPU, such as the desktop variant, it would certainly suffer from thermal throttling.

Less heat means smaller fans and thinner chassis. Another benefit to the Max-Q design is the power brick. Because of the lower TDP, the size of the power brick is down to W, and is relatively portable compared to the other GTX laptops out there. All of my benchmark testings was conducted with it disabled but the gaming was done with it being on. So as far as the performance is concerned, this laptop can pretty much handle anything you throw at it.

As far as gaming is concerned, it will definitely perform well, although it falls a little short of a desktop i7 paired with a desktop GTX Still, considering the small form factor, no complaints here. If you want to upgrade the storage in the future, you can. By the way, if you want to perform these upgrades, you have your work cut out for you. First, you need to remove the four Phillips screws on the back.

Good thing Asus provides a Phillips screwdriver in the box, right? Next, to remove the cover, you need to open the lid so the legs push it outward. Then the cover slides off. Side note: Asus actually includes directions on how to do this. Their intent is to give you a way to clean your fans without breaking your system — hence the free screwdriver. Remove all the screws on the back to release the top cover. I used a plastic opening tool to push it up, but a credit card would also probably work.

Once you get that edge, the rest comes up nicely. Underneath is a work of beauty. I was really disappointed to see this because I remember reading multiple previews from Computex stating that there were four M. Here are my results:.

I tested out my typical test games as well. All things considered, the performance was pretty good. Here were my results:. What will push this to the limit, though would be to hook it up to a QHD or 4K monitor, but in this case you can also buff it up with external graphics hooked up through Thunderbolt 3.

One quick thing to mention for those that wish to game on battery: you might want to look somewhere else. The heat is a little troublesome on the CPU side, but that can be fixed with a slight undervolt. The GPU is far under the thermal limits in all my testing, so no worries there. There is some room for overclocking the GPU as well.

My Firestrike score increased to a combined score of with the graphics score going up to I also reran the Witcher 3 at the default Ultra p settings — my framerates increased to fps. GPU temps were only a couple degrees higher. Considering the stock Firestrike scores on the Alienware 17, I reviewed the other day, were with a graphics score of , this is actually pretty impressive.

There is some controversy out there about the Max-Q design. But I personally do see some benefit in using an underpowered in lieu of an overclocked This is likely what allows this thin design to happen in the first place. Now if it were possible to put that in this laptop and achieve the same performance, then I think that should be an option and at a discounted price. The cooling system on the Zephyrus is pretty interesting, to say the least.

From what I can tell, the intakes come in from the sides and through tiny vent holes on the top. The exhaust is through the back of the laptop — both through the vents and that flimsy panel that swings open when you open the lid.

I was a little skeptical about having moving parts in order to keep the laptop cool, but it appears that the mechanism on the bottom is actually necessary. As you saw with my gaming benchmarks, the CPU was getting close to thermally throttling so it needed all the help it could get. Really though, if I was designing my own laptop, I think I would choose quality thermal paste over a moving part….

I took some measurements on the top and bottom of the laptop, both during normal use and during a minute gaming session. I also took some sound readings, both at ear level and from behind the laptop lid where the fans exhaust. This is coming soon in a GeForce Experience update. Apparently, activating it will configure game settings to operate so that the fans will be nearly silent. From my experience, this is a great module and carries a perfectly stable connection at all times.

Indoors, I maxed out my connection in most parts of my house 90Mbps. Outdoors, roughly 50 feet away from my router and between 2 walls, I achieved a 67Mbps connection. Not bad at all. Bluetooth 4. I plan on updating this portion later when I test to see how fast the ethernet is.

Playing my typical test song, I was only able to get the amplitude up to 65dB. Bass was only registered at frequencies as low as 80 Hz. At max volume, with high pitched noises, I noticed some distortion though — especially with the Windows notification sounds. Webcam — A standard HD webcam is included, centered on top of the screen. The quality greatly improves in a well-lit room. The configuration I received has a 50 Whr battery.

This was probably my biggest concern when researching the laptop beforehand, and rightfully so. The Asus Zephyrus lasted a sad 2 hours and 39 minutes before shutting down. Using HWinfo, I was also able to test the discharge rate at certain conditions and estimate how long the laptop would last in those cases.

The main culprit for the low battery life is Gsync. This is just me — but for laptops such as these, I wish the manufacturer would throw a switch or give another model with Optimus enabled. The battery life is going to be a real deal breaker for some people. But for those that want to use this in place on a traditional ultrabook, you might want to look elsewhere.

It looks like the demand is pretty high for this machine. Not only does it have a lot of horsepower, it also offers a very thin form factor that allows you to carry it anywhere with ease. I think those factors alone make up for the shortcomings of the laptop.

But those shortcomings might prevent some of you from taking the plunge. The keyboard being on the edge, for example, might be too difficult for some to deal with. The mini trackpad might also be an issue. Still, I think the main problem with the laptop is the battery life though. Max-Q certification is supposed to have a 40dB ceiling. Can you talk more about your 50dB readings? Would you say it's noticeably much quieter in general than other or style laptops?

Derek Sullivan. I'm pretty sure their spec is at ear level. I can't imagine the limit being 40dB at the fan exhaust. My readings in the back we're pretty close to the fans — not somewhere you'll normally be. In your opinion, excluding the ridiculous price that razer choosed for its laptop, which one is better between the asus zephyrus and the razer blade pro?

Considering the touchpad, build quality and additional features 4k touch screen, excellent speakers etc. Tough call. If you can get over the keyboard and the price, the RBP is a pretty decent laptop. I could not get used to that keyboard, though, no matter how hard I tried. I'm very much accustomed to the Asus keyboard now. I think I'd probably pick the GX Realistically, the only thing the RBP has over the Asus is the trackpad.

Maybe the build quality as well, but the RBP is significantly thicker and heavier. That hz FHD screen is much more suitable for gaming than the 4k screen. The keyboard up front make perfect sense, I don't need to lean forward to game and have my palm being fried like on a frying pan while under load. The keyboard at the edge feels like desktop keyboard pretty much and desktop keyboard some do have built in wrist rest or some needs to buy a gel wrist pad.

Keyboard design is win win, notebook not really meant to sit on your lap. It works but it's hard to hold your laptop in place without flipping it over. Great review as always. And why? On top of that, it's much too expensive, possibly has Gsync issues and also is thermally challenged. The other two choices are different animals and it'll all come down to whether or not you value portability over a little better performance and more hard disk space.

Both screens are hz and have about the same pixel densities. The Zephyrus screen has a slight edge being IPS. Both keyboards and trackpads are good. The Aorus outperforms the Zephyrus, for sure, but it's a lot larger — the main trade-off.

But the Aorus has 2x m. To answer your question now, do I think the Zephyrus is the better machine? In many ways, yes. But could I live with it? For me — no. If I didn't need all that though, I'd probably stick with the Zephyrus.

Really helpful. It's also IPS, so the viewing angles and contrast are better. Even though the resolution is higher, the Aorus display is still a larger display, so the pixel density is only 26ppi higher than the FHD display. Depending on how close you are, you might not be able to tell the difference in sharpness.

There's minor trade-offs to both but I consider both screens to be excellent and could live with either. Literally, the only thing I don't care for on the Aorus is when looking at it from above when it's on a desk. The vertical viewing angles are just not as good as an IPS screen. Great, been back and forth between the two for a while and was going for the X7 DT but if the difference between the screen is negligble the Zephrus seems the better as I don't need lots of storage.

One last question, how much quieter is the Zephrus if at all? Thanks again. My sound meter says they both are nearly the same, but it didn't take into account the time and how annoying the fans are. I found the Aorus to be ok but I much prefer the Zephyrus, as the fan noise is directed downward and away from the user.

Any sound created is very dampened. What are your thoughts on this given the limited Gb standard storage and 16GB Ram? Worth the extra investment? If you can source the drive and ram and do it yourself, I'd say go that route.

If it were me, I'd definitely be updating it myself over paying that much for more storage. It's a pretty involved teardown though, and not very straightforward, so I can see paying the extra to have someone else do it. Is it worth it?

For me, I would do it if I had no other choice. But everyone is different and most could probably live with GB and deal with external storage. Don't forget that TB3 port can support an external drive as well. Long term, I'm not sure the extent of it. I didn't use it long enough to find out. I think it's safe to assume it collects dust though, otherwise Asus wouldn't have included a phillips screwdriver to take the bottom cover off.

They actually include maintenance directions on how to properly clean it. Hi Derek, fantastic review. I was looking for something as indepth as this. I have a couple of questions which I'd greatly appreciate your answer to. How durable did this laptop feel to you? If I were to purchase it, I would want a minimum of 3 years of function, do you think the build quality, thermals and such would give me this? The competitor to the Zephyrus seems to be the Asus Triton , to my knowledge they seem to have the exact same, if not similar specs.

What is your opinion on the Asus Triton over the Zephyrus? Which one seems like a better investment? With the exception of the bottom panel, the laptop is pretty well built and durable. Could easily last 3 years. But that bottom panel is the wild card. It's a little flimsy and it's a mechanical moving part, so there's no telling if and when it'll break.

As much as I got my power cord caught in it, I could certainly see something snagging an edge and potentially harming the cover. The good news is that even without the cover, the laptop will still work. You'd either have to replace it or put some new rubber feet on the bottom though. As for the Acer, I have no opinion on it. It's still not released, so there's no telling how well it compares to the Asus.

I just purchased one, after reading your review, as well as many others. Quiet gaming is my top priority. I don't have to have the fastest equipment, but I do need the quietest. Having a machine designed for top gaming performance makes for a lot of leeway in throttling back. I'm actually able to run my older game titles with all the FPS I need and no fan noise at all.

That said, I have one big glaring issue: Accent lights. Just like you said in your review, they won't turn off. I've been scouring the web for any indication of a way to disable them and not one clue. I can see no other option but putting tape over the lights gasp. If you have Asus contacts, I'd be interested to hear their plans for those lights. I don't personally have a contact but I think Andrei does. Maybe he can ask. I really doubt it'll help though. It's most likely something that's built into the charging circuit.

Totally dumb if you ask me but this isn't the first time Asus had done something like that. One of my first Zenbooks had a similar feature with the charging cable that I ended up putting tape over. Andrei Girbea. I haven't touched the Zephyrus, but with most Asus laptops there has never been an option to control the lights through software, so I'd reckon most of them are hard-wired, while the logos on the lid are usually lit by the screen's panel.

In this latter case there should be a way to go inside and place something between the panel and the outer shell to block the light. With the others, if you're very technical you could open the laptops, find the LEDs and somehow disconnect them, but you'd void warranty and really have to know what you're doing there. Other than that, I'd reckon your best bet are some sort of decals. For some reason Asus considers these lights a feature, a selling factor.

Perhaps some people appreciate them, otherwise OEMs wouldn't keep putting them on so many laptops. So how do you make a screenshot if it doesnt have the printscreen button? Really awesome thank you for the undervolt. I did It's more sustainable without throttle and for the long run. While most can be undervolted. The inch laptop ranks either first Home Score or third Work Score among the competition, but the advantage of the Alienware 15 R3 and Gigabyte Aero 15 is extremely small, so they are basically on par.

Subjectively, the system is very responsive, including boot times, data transfers, application launches or loading times. This is, however, not surprising thanks to the fast SSD. In order to keep the case as compact as possible, Asus has not included a 2. The manufacturer ships the laptop with a PCIe drive to utilize the full potential of the technology. The performance is excellent.

CrystalDiskMark 5. The two top models from the Pascal generation offer sufficient performance for smooth gameplay in all modern games at the highest settings. We want to check whether this is also the case for the Max-Q versions, but we start with some specifications. According to Nvidia, the new models have been optimized for efficiency both in terms of hardware as well as software via drivers. Most of the basic specifications remind us of the standard versions from However, there are differences in the core clocks.

More information about Nvidia's Max-Q design is available in our dedicated article. Our gaming benchmarks confirm the synthetic results. The average performance ranking for all 24 tested titles is shown in the following table:. The Zephyrus can generally handle every game smoothly in the native Full HD resolution x pixels ; even the Hz panel is maxed out in some cases. External Hz panel would not make much sense here — at least in high or maximum settings.

Also great: The driver we use the preloaded ForceWar We never encountered graphics errors, crashes or blue screens during the gaming benchmarks. One of the most interesting aspects of Nvidia's Max-Q design is the noise limit. We can more or less confirm this target range as long as you run "standard" 3D applications. Our measurement device shows up to 46 dB A in this impractical scenario.

The inch system handles idle periods at a very subtle noise level between 32 and 34 dB A , even though the fans cover higher frequencies, so they are subjectively louder compared to other gaming notebooks and could be annoying for sensitive users. The cooling solution is never silent, but there is at least no unnecessary pulsating while idling.

The major disadvantage of the slim construction and the limited noise level is the high temperature development of the case and the hardware. The new Max-Q design is not a "saviour" for notebooks after all. However, the main issue here should be the CPU. Intel has hardly worked on the thermal management or the efficiency, respectively, due to the lack of real competition, so the processor gets very warm in almost all gaming laptops. However, we performed the measurements on a very hot summer day, so the values should be lower in cooler environments, especially during the winter.

There is no criticism for the idle results. These are the results with the second test model at lower ambient temperatures maximum load scenario. Especially the palm rests stay cooler. Asus has positioned the speakers on the left and right next to the keyboard, so none of the components can affect the cooling performance.

The area should usually not be covered by the hands, so we do not expect any limitations for the sound in practice. Speaking of sound: Our audio analysis shows an average performance among gaming laptops. The sound quality is similar to the Gigabyte Aero 15, which represents mids and highs quite accurately, but it has the same struggles with deep tones and bass.

The maximum volume of 83 dB A is sufficient for small and medium-sized rooms. The performance is certainly okay for portable multimedia purposes, and Asus deserves some respect, considering the slim case. You should still use external solutions if possible when you use the laptop stationary.

We used the sound profile Music for our test. The software Sonic Studio II provides several modes and sound enhancements. Nvidia deserves praise for the optimization of the efficiency. While regular GTX laptops require extremely bulky and heavy watt power adapters, the Zephyrus requires only a watt model similar to most GTX systems.

The PSU measures just The positive impression is confirmed by our benchmarks. The inch laptop consumes only 79 watts in 3DMark This value could also be from a GTX notebook or it even beats these systems. The consumption moves towards the GTX only under maximum load. Asus uses G-Sync in favor of Optimus, so the idle results are just mediocre 18 to 31 watts. Gigabyte does a better job with the Aero 15 12 to 20 watts.

One of the biggest issues for many potential buyers is probably the battery runtime. Asus has equipped the GX with a 4-cell battery to realize the "ultra-slim and ultra-fast" concept. Why get a very slim and light chassis, when the battery is drained after a short while? However, this is unfortunately the case with the Zephyrus. The longest runtime, even at the lowest luminance, is 3 hours. Around 2 hours web browsing and 2 hours video playback display at nits in both cases is no highlight either.

Stress the notebook harder and the battery will run out of juice after less than one hour. For comparison: The Wh battery of the Alienware 15 R3 manages twice as much in all scenarios. The battery performance is at least not significantly reduced. And: 2 How important is the mobility aspect? Users willing to pay a lot for an extremely slim and powerful notebook get a very stylish and comparatively light case.

It features great materials, a Hz panel with G-Sync support and a level of performance that — in this class — is unrivaled so far. However, if you are more price-conscious and do not care about every last millimeter, the GX suddenly appears a lot less attractive. The ultra-slim concept does not only affect the temperatures the chassis gets very hot under load , but also the maintenance, input devices, port selection no card reader, no RJLAN and especially the battery runtime, which is disappointingly short for a supposedly mobile laptop at up to 3 hours.

All in all, the Zephyrus GX still gets a "good" rating and will enter the Top 10 ranking for slim and light gaming laptops in the next update. Simon Leitner. Asus has once again managed to have the slimmest device.

For now. Despite its height of just We have already had the chance to review the ultra-slim gamer. Update: Higher rating thanks to second test model. Florian Glaser, Klaus Hinum, J. Intel Core iHQ 4 x 2. Speakers: 2. Asus homepage Asus notebook section. Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications. Right side: Thunderbolt 3 incl. Gaming Center.

Sonic Studio II. Sonic Radar II. Input Devices. Keyboard The keyboard is one area where you definitely notice the slim construction. Touchpad The touchpad with the dedicated mouse buttons is sitting right next to the keyboard to make room for the cooling. Chiclet keyboard …. Touchpad with numpad function.

CalMAN: Grayscale. CalMAN: Grayscale calibrated. Outdoor use. Subpixel array. Viewing angles. We start the performance section with some system screenshots of the GX Single-core rendering. Multi-core rendering. Cinebench R15 Cinebench R Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit. System Performance. Storage Devices. GPU Performance. Turbo Gear Standard. Turbo Gear Extreme. Gaming Performance. System Noise. System noise idle.

System noise load. Speaker measurements. Noise Level Idle. Stress test. Maximum load top Optris PI Maximum load bottom Optris PI Witcher 3. Power Supply max. Pink Noise measured at the headset port, relative linear. Energy Management. Power Consumption. Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements.

Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here. Battery Runtime. Cons - display response times could be better. Test model courtesy of Asus Germany. Simon Leitner Chassis. Opinion: Nvidia's Max-Q — Maximum efficiency, minimum performance?

Zephyrus gx501 mouse acceleration mac os

GTX 1080 graphics in a five-pound laptop - Asus ROG Zephyrus GX501 - Review zephyrus gx501

Valuable charlotte tilbury scent of a dream think, that

Следующая статья razer wireless mouse

Другие материалы по теме

  • 213 team
  • A nightmare on elm street nes
  • Bss88
  • Broncolor para 88
  • Jeff wayne the war of the worlds 1978
  • 2 комментариев

    1. Kagajas :

      iphone 12 ram

    2. Zujind :

      lustful sacraments

    Добавить комментарий

    Ваш e-mail не будет опубликован. Обязательные поля помечены *